Immigration – misunderstandings and lost opportunities

The term “immigration” is widely used by the public in the UK to talk about three very different issues.

Three kinds of immigration.

Firstly there is EU migration, the Freedom of Movement for workers (and certain other groups) in the European Union. It’s a pretty straightforward easy to understand term for something desirable for both citizens and member states; it makes sense that where there is work available, workers should be able to move to a location as near to that work as possible. Having available work in one location and workers being idle in other parts of the Union makes no sense. It’s up to individual member states to invest in infrastructure in those areas of high employment to deal with any influx of workers and for member states to invest in businesses in areas of low employment to attract workers back. Without workers paying tax you cannot run your country. Having a debate about the rules of when workers moving between member states can claim any type of welfare benefits is perfectly normal and agreements can be reached without too much issue, and without having any effect on the principle of Freedom of Movement.

Secondly there is immigration from outside the EU. There is at this stage in the world’s development no Freedom of Movement worldwide so people without EU passports can enter only by applying to individual member states or by trying to get in illegally. Dealing with legal immigration is a fairly straightforward process of quotas and applications. Dealing with the issue of illegal immigration is a bigger issue, and this is where agreement between EU member states is vital. A collective response is needed.

Thirdly there are asylum seekers, or would-be refugees, who are people fleeing their home states because of persecution or fear of persecution and often fleeing war. In this case it is our moral as well as legal obligation to offer them safe refuge.

Now that we’ve cleared that up, the real debate can begin. The current mass influx of migrants arriving on the southern coasts of Europe, a combination of economic migrants and asylum seekers, is a big problem. Sometimes categorising who is an economic migrant and who is a genuine asylum seeker is not always an easy one. And in circumstances of War and oppression where the objective of both is simply survival, then the categorisation is superfluous.

In the case of those escaping the horrors of war, the UK government is saying the root cause of their leaving must be dealt with. Well, yes, this is obvious, but dealing with the root cause must come hand in hand with dealing with the effect, and this is where the Common Borders campaign comes in . A fireman who goes looking for the cause of the fire without dealing with the flames would be rightly condemned for dereliction of duty.

How we deal with our share of asylum seekers and economic migrants in a compassionate and responsible way must be the current debate – not whether or not we accept them!

Missed Opportunities!

There is turmoil in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon and those stuck in these countries are forcibly subject to an ideology at odds with that of any civilised society. We do not wish to encourage these dangerous boat journeys but those people who have made that journey, and those in camps in Lebanon and Turkey must be helped. And some of them relocated in Europe, even temporarily.

Many migrants will potentially return. Each EU member state should take its quota of asylum seekers and migrants and help them recover from their ordeals.

Part of that help could be to give them new skills so that in future they can return to their countries and help to rebuild them. We can help them to form overseas aid groups and even potentially forces that can attempt rescue missions, so they can be of help to those who have been left behind. These are people with the language skills, an understanding of the situation, culture and challenges faced in their homelands, information that is invaluable to helping to restore peace and prosperity there. These ideas need to be discussed in an open and constructive environment.

What we must not do is turn our backs to suffering and cries for help.

UK Party Leader: Stuart Clark

Disclaimer: This article expresses the personal views of its author, and may not necessarily reflect the official policies or views of the Federalist Party.

Federalist Party of the United Kingdom meet-up

Dear Federalist Party members and supporters,

It’s time for The Federalist Party to introduce ourselves to the people of the Britain and present Federalism as a new alternative to the current dysfunctional political system we have here in the UK.

To make this happen, we’re organising a big meet-up in London at Ye Olde Cock Tavern in Fleet Street.

Saturday 13 June 2015 @15:00-17:00
22 Fleet Street, London EC4Y 1AA

details of how to get there from their website

We’ll talk about how we want to make a difference and about our ideas for upgrading our democracy. It’ll be social as well, of course, and we will elect a new board for the organisation, but it’s mostly a forum for like-minded people to get together and discuss what we can do to make our country and our society better to live in for all. And a chance to do something about it!

We’d really like you to come! Please let us know if you are able to be part of this event as we’re trying to get a suitable venue according to how many people will show up.

thanks – stuart

UK Party Leader: Stuart Clark

Join the fight for local power

True democracy demands that decisions are made by representative groups of people with a clear understanding of the effects their decisions will have on ordinary people within the community.

This is currently not happening. MPs in Westminster do not represent the average people affected by a lot of the decisions they make, and they have little experience with the effects of the decisions they make on normal people.

It’s time to update our democracy.

We are fighting to bring real power back to where they naturally belong — your local community!

Our core beliefs:

  • Decisions should be made locally to the people they affect
  • Decisions are better made by people that understand and are affected by them themselves
  • Local councils, cities and regions should have more power to make decisions on regional matters
  • Westminster should be restricted to making decisions that affect all regions within the UK and should avoid making decisions where the majority of voting MPs are not affected by them.

Register your interest with the Federalist Party today to get the latest news as we start our campaign to update democracy in the UK!

Election night message from the Federalist Party Leader

For the Lib Dems this election is crucial – they need the chance to prove themselves
The British public, still unsure of how coalition governments work, cannot disassociate the Lib Dems from the decisions made by the Conservative led coalition. This is unfortunate for them but also a lot of the blame lies with the way they have been too quick to back policies and decisions they would surely have criticised had they not been in government.
If Labour gets under 15 seats less than the conservatives tonight and the Lib Dems have over 20 seats then they may form a coalition with Labour. This would give Labour the comfort they need to be able to form a government without any deals with SNP and would give the Lib Dems the chance to prove that they can do what they say and work in Coalition with either party.
They also have the chance not to make the same mistakes they made in the last five years and keep a clear identity as a junior party.
This is the type of scenario we in the Federalist Party are hoping for as any minority government will surely advance the course of federalism and electoral reform that we espouse.
Register your interest with the Federalist Party today to get the latest news as we start our campaign to update democracy in the UK!
Good luck tonight my federalist friends – however you vote.
UK Party Leader: Stuart Clark

New Year Message from the Federalist Party of the United Kingdom

Dear friends, for most of us Monday 5th January is the start to our new year as we head back to work, and we take on the new challenges that 2015 offers us. We have four months ahead of us of the main political parties making false promises. Written to compete with the others message, by writers skilled at coming up with slogans and policies devoid of any real conviction, to be spoken by career politicians whose ambition trumps any sense of duty and service they may have once held.
But wait, there is something different in 2015!
They can no longer get away with it. The public has seen through this and have decided they want something different.
2014 will be remembered for the rise in nationalism in the UK and across Europe caused mainly by people looking for anything but the main political parties.

It’s time that we present a better alternative, one that doesn’t look for sections of our society to blame for our problems. We must show the merits of strengthened local government to end the failing system of centrialised government that has stagnated and can no longer provide any leadership. Wholesale reform of the houses of parliament is needed.

And it is only with your help that we can make this happen. I look forward to working with you in 2015 to make this happen.

UK Party Leader: Stuart Clark